Nidhipati

Proof of Spend for AI agents. A signed receipt that proves what an agent was authorized to pay, what it actually paid, what it used and what was refunded. Not a token, not custody, not another payment rail.

Рельсы двигают деньги. Nidhipati доказывает, что движение было правильным.

Status: v0.6 — five CLIs, an MCP server, 89 tests, official MCP Registry and Glama listing.

Site: https://mrpkk.github.io/nidhipati/
Free scan: https://github.com/mrpkk/nidhipati/issues/new?template=free-spend-audit.yml

Reserve and NAV report

For tokenised assets: the issuer's own numbers turned into a NAV with explicit formulas and an evidence hash per line. The verdict is backed, underbacked, or incomplete — and the ratio is refused when any line has no price, because a number computed over half a reserve is not a number.

nidhipati-reserve report examples/reserve.example.json --key keys/private.pem --markdown report.md

NAV = Σ quantity × price × (1 − haircut) − liabilities
ratio = NAV / supply

The statement hash is compared with the file if you provide it. The disclaimer travels inside the signed document. Details and the partner/legal checklist: docs/RESERVE-REPORT.md.

Resolution evidence

When a market resolves and someone disagrees, the question is whether the resolver's sources say what the resolver claims and whether they agree with each other. The report answers with four verdicts — supported, disputed, single_source, insufficient — and never picks a winner.

nidhipati-resolve report examples/resolve.example.json --key keys/private.pem --markdown report.md

Details: docs/RESOLUTION-EVIDENCE.md.

Reconciliation

Invoices on one side, transfers on the other. The report names what is closed, what nobody paid, and what arrived without an invoice — a transfer that duplicates a payment is counted once, never twice.

nidhipati-reconcile run examples/invoices.example.csv examples/transactions.example.csv --csv matches.csv

Details: docs/RECONCILIATION.md.

MCP server (for agents, not shells)

The same five checks over the Model Context Protocol: verify_receipt, audit_spend, reserve_report, resolve_report, reconcile_books. Input is data, never a file path and never a network call; the answers are the same reports the CLIs produce, including the refusal to print a backing ratio when a line has no price.

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/call",
 "params":{"name":"reserve_report","arguments":{"reserve":{...}}}}

python3 -m nidhipati_proof.mcp_stdio      # stdio transport
docker build -t nidhipati-mcp . && docker run -i --rm nidhipati-mcp

Five tools, all read-only: no custody, no keys, no chain read.

Official MCP Registry: https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=nidhipati (io.github.mrpkk/nidhipati, OCI ghcr.io/mrpkk/nidhipati:0.6.0).
Glama listing: https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/mrpkk/nidhipati.

Free scan, and what it costs after

Send records of what your agents spent and get the audit back — no card, no account: open a free-scan issue. Paid: $2,500 fixed audit, $1,500/mo retainer, or 20% of verified savings. Full terms, including what is not included: docs/OFFER.md.

In CI, on every run:

- uses: mrpkk/nidhipati@v0.2.0
  with:
    records: billing/agent-spend.csv
    policy: billing/policy.json

Quick start

python3 -m pip install -e .[dev]
python3 -m pytest -q
python3 -m nidhipati_proof.cli verify examples/proof-of-spend.example.json --pubkey <base64url>

What it checks

• schema and canonical JSON;
• Ed25519 signature;
• mandate expiry vs settlement time;
• amount, asset, network, payee;
• usage.quantity × usage.unit_price vs payment;
• refund ≤ payment;
• verdict allow for a settled payment;
• receipt ID/replay (v0.2 store).

Agent spend audit

A signed receipt proves one charge. A bill proves a month. The audit reads the records you already have (CSV or JSON) and names the rows where money left without a reason:

python3 -m pip install -e .
nidhipati-spend audit examples/spend-sample.csv --policy examples/spend-policy.example.json
nidhipati-spend audit records.csv --json > report.json

Exit code 1 when there is an error — a pipeline can fail on it. The report keeps three amounts apart on purpose: spent without a reason (duplicates, escalation, failed calls, refunds not returned), above the usual price (an estimate, not proof), and over the limit (the money may have been spent on real work).

The sample is synthetic and labelled: it contains every finding once, so you can see what a report looks like before trusting it with real invoices.

Honest limits

• v0.1 does not verify the on-chain transaction; onchain_verified=false is explicit.
• It is not a statutory audit, legal, tax, or investment advice.
• It does not guarantee the service was good; it proves the payment was within mandate.
• No custody, no money transmission, no token.

Docs

• SPEC.md — product, architecture, modules, SEO, monetization, 30/60/90.
• PROGRESS.md — slices, acceptance, metrics.
• docs/PROMPT-AND-IDEAS.md — prompt and decisions for RAG.
• docs/SEO-MONETIZATION.md — keywords, pages, funnel, pricing.
• docs/LAUNCH-KIT.md — Show HN, Reddit, Product Hunt, X/LinkedIn copy.
• docs/DEMO.md — real commands and sample output.
• docs/AGENT-SPEND-AUDIT.md, docs/RESERVE-REPORT.md, docs/RESOLUTION-EVIDENCE.md, docs/RECONCILIATION.md — module rules.
• schemas/proof-of-spend.schema.json — v0.1 schema.
• examples/proof-of-spend.example.json — example.

License

Apache-2.0.